Understanding teacher agency: The importance of relationships

Priestley, M., Biesta, G.J.J. & Robinson, S. (2012).

Understanding teacher agency: The importance of relationships. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, 13-17 April 2012

This paper is really interesting and reinforces a lot of what I believe about enhancing collegiality through Learning Rounds.Priestley et al argue that the key to teacher agency is relationships – relational resources supported by a web of strong horizontal  connections will allow a collaborative culture to develop, facilitate further relationships and develop a stronger sense of teachers as agents of change. Add curriculum change into the equation and it becomes obvious that  vertical command and control structures will clearly inhibit all of this.

Learning Rounds have a great deal to offer this as a model of developing collaborative culture.  They offer an opportunity to collaborate in non-hierarchical, non subject specific relationships through discussion and they enable teacher agency in agreeing an area of focus for CPD and planning a whole  school  response to the issue. Do they create a greater sense of collaborative culture? I’ll have to get a move on with my research to find out!


About catrionao

I'm a lecturer at UWS and a PhD student at Stirling University, studying a school based practice of teacher professional learning.
This entry was posted in CPD and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s